Monday, August 11, 2014

2014 Tour of Utah: Stage 6 Depart

Well, it was a boisterous atmosphere at the Tour of Utah Stage Six Depart at Rice Eccles Stadium, there were cycling starved fanatics of all stripes, including families with children. I arrived late, planning to ride up to Big Mountain, but when I checked my bike the front wheel had an overnight flat, Murphy's law! But I didn't really miss anything, most of the riders were sequestered in their team buses, and the depart was thirty minutes late. I did wander over to the BMC team bus and saw Cadel Evans. Cadel Evans is the most gracious man I have ever seen. He immediately walked over to the youngest fan in the crowd and signed an autograph; the young man was smiling in genuine happiness; then he posed for photographs holding some of the fanatics young children. I tried to get a photograph, but my camera batteries failed at the most inopportune moment, so nothing exists in long term memory except thoughts of a very charismatic man who is also an outstanding ambassador of our sport. Of course, I did take some photographs, but alas, most were so horrible that it would be pointless to print them.

Tour of Utah Tenth Year Edition.

Photos from top:
Enrique, a chess pal.
Two DRAPAC Professional Cycling Team (Australia) riders.  Adam Phelan (75) and team leader Jai Crawford (71) who were gracious enough to allow me to photograph them.  Thanks, guys!! 
Rob Britton (Team Smartstop)
Chris Horner
A BMC rider
Cadel Evans
The National Anthem. 


Enrique

Adam Phelan (75) and Jai Crawford (71)  DRAPAC Professional Cycling Team

Rob Britton Team Smartstop

Chris Horner Lampre

BMC Rider and DS

Cadel Evans BMC

Pledge of allegiance

Happy kids

Stage 6 Winner: Cadel Evans 4:34:31 Tour of Utah Winner: Tom Danielson

Saturday, August 2, 2014

2014 Tour of Utah: Preview

The 2014 Tour of Utah will be a scenic spectacle; it is impossible to describe the breathtaking beauty of Utah's southern climes; you have to see it for yourself or see photographs; descriptions are inadequate and meaningless.  Nevertheless: the climbs this year far exceed anything in the past; the race reminds me of six days of racing in the Alps or Pyrenees during the Tour de France!  Tough hard beyond category climbs; long difficult climbs, and dizzying descents.  Stage 6 of the Tour of Utah features a leg-breaking climb over Guardsman Pass, followed by a 14-mile descent down Big Cottonwood Canyon then a six-mile climb up Little Cottonwood Canyon.  Oh!  A friend of mine and me rode up to Big Cottonwood Canyon to Guardsman Pass one fine day, but we were turned back at the gate; the road was closed buried by four feet of snow!  In May!  Whew!  We were forced to turn around and descend the fourteen miles; quickly you run out of pedals; you could spin at full speed frictionless and never gain an ounce of speed.  Damn!  The peloton screaming down that pass, especially near the base of the hill where some nasty hairpin turns are located fills me with dread and expectation.  Of course, there is a short interval before you enter Little Cottonwood Canyon, a little flat section, to get you warmed up a bit before the torture starts again.  Little Cottonwood Canyon is about the same length as L'Alpe d'Huez, about seven point five percent grade, no joke, even for the professional riders.

There is no circuit stage in Salt Lake this year. 

There is a feminine addition this year.  The women will field 12 teams, the women will ride a 2.2-mile circuit at Miller Motorsports Park on Wednesday, August 6, 2014, in Tooele, Utah.  Admission is free to the public.  I love the fact that women will be included this year.  A circuit race is a start, but I hope that the girls will have a chance to compete on the road in the future; let's see how well the ladies climb!

The men.  Who are the favorites?

BMC
Cadel Evans
Brent Bookwalter

Cadel Evans won the Tour de France!  Brent Bookwalter has competed in several Tour of Utah races and will prove a dangerous lieutenant.

Cannondale
Ivan Basso

Ivan Basso is a world-class climber and a tough competitor.  Good enough to be in the top ten in the general classification, if not win the entire race outright. 

Garmin Sharp

Thomas Danielson

Defending champion.  I am sure Mr. Danielson is a champion motivated to repeat his 2013 feat.  And let's face it, Garmin Sharp looks to have the best team.

Lampere-Merida
 
Christopher Horner

Tough journeyman pro-tour rider.  Christopher Horner has been known in the past to break away from the peloton, and succeed in not being reeled in by the peloton.  Christopher Horner could provide an unpredictability factor and shake things up.

Trek Factory Racing

Jens Voight.

Another old-time journeyman pro-tour rider.  Tough as nails and ready to win.

Jelly Belly

Freddy Rodriquez

"Fast" Freddy Rodriquez, more of a sprinter than a climber.  Everybody loves "Fast" Freddy, including me.  But he does seem a little out of place in this race.

Then there are the unpredictable.  Some of these team rosters show an amazingly large number of Colombian riders, and Colombian riders can climb like "angels of the mountains."  I imagine that some of these Colombian riders will take stage wins, and don't be surprised if they finish high in the general classification.

Past Winners Missing in Action

Levi Leipheimer
Francisco Mancebo Perez
Jeff Louder (who by the way was introduced to the crowd at stage 6 depart.  I did not see his name on the rider list, however.  Sorry about that.)

Anyway, come on out, you can see great scenery and great racing all at the same time!




Saturday, July 12, 2014

Seven Deadly Sins: Book Review


Seven Deadly Sins, David Walsh, Atria Books, 2012.

David Walsh characterizes himself as a "troll," who expectorated into the soup of cycling expectations of reforms, which were being promoted after the disastrous fallout from the Festina Affair during the 1998 Tour de France.  During the 1998 Tour de France, in an overreaction to what was perceived as blatant performance-enhancing drug abuse, midnight raids were conducted on team hotels at random by the French police.  The riders protested these "outrageous" raids by plucking bibs off backs while riding, (thereby invalidating the stage results), laying down their bikes refusing to ride, strike! teams packed up and exited the race, en masse.  In an attempt to salvage the catastrophic reaction by furious cycling fanatics to the 1998 carnage, the 1999 Tour de France was proclaimed by Jean-Marie LeBlanc as the "Tour of Renewal."  Mr. LeBlanc promised the peloton would refrain from doping and ride at a slower pace.  The 1999 Tour de France had an additional unexpected attraction: Lance Armstrong, a man who had overcome long odds of survival fighting an aggressive form of testicular cancer, a Cinderella story waiting to be written.  Astonishingly enough, the miracle return of Lance Armstrong could not have been choreographed better, as Lance Armstrong unexpectedly won the 1999 Tour de France prologue.  Cycling had not seen anything more dramatic since Greg LeMond made his miraculous comeback after being shot by his cousin, by winning the 1989 and 1990 Tours. Incredibly, Lance Armstrong's surprising performance during the 1999 Tour de France; considering his dismal race results when riding for Motorola; shocked anyone who was paying attention, and David Walsh suspected foul play.  There were other reasons to be concerned.  The tempo of the 1999 Tour de France was faster than the pace of the 1998 Tour, not slower.  Also, during the 1999 Tour de France, Lance Armstrong tested positive for a corticosteroid that was on the prohibited list.  Lance Armstrong claimed that he had a medical certificate, a prescription from his doctor to treat saddle sores, before the Tour started, although there is proof that previous to the Tour, Lance Armstrong claimed on his original therapeutic use exemption form filed with the International Cycling Union (UCI) that he was not using any sanctioned drug for any medical reason.  Of course, the prescription was written and backdated after the positive test, but this practice was common and even condoned by the UCI.  Evidence of this UCI chicanery was testified to during the Festina affair trial in Lille France:
"Laurent Brochard, a Festina rider, told how he won the World Championship road race in 1997, subsequently tested positive but an official from the UCI informed his team manager that a backdated medical certificate would get him off." P.109
David Walsh suggests that the UCI knew of and approved a backdated medical certificate for Lance Armstrong during the 1999 Tour de France. But because the UCI refused to enforce the law, a long period of sports fraud on cycling was about to commence.  This fraud would result in a long litany of crimes by Lance Armstrong.  The UCI and Hein Verbruggen allegedly would attempt to suppress public knowledge of these crimes by illegal cover-ups and acceptance of cash gratuities.

David Walsh states his case and suspicion of Lance Armstrong most succinctly:
"We knew that the '99 Tour de France was ushering in the reign of a great pretender but were powerless to do much about it.  It wasn't just the feeling that [Lance] Armstrong had doped and won, what most rankled was the confederacy of cheerleaders which protected him: the UCI bosses who knew about the uniformly elevated haematocrit values, especially in the U.S. Postal team, and decided that was a part of the story best-kept secret, the journalists who saw poor Christophe Bassons being bullied out of the race and thought, 'That's okay, he's only a small rider', and the Tour de France organizer who decreed that Armstrong had 'saved' the Tour." P.86.
David Walsh insists that if Jean-Marie LeBlanc and the UCI would have had a spine, the reign of the pretender could have been nipped in the bud.  Instead, the UCI shirked their responsibility, so it became an arduous process of the few responsible journalists who refused to imbibe the Lance Armstrong myth to bring down the greatest fraud in cycling history with investigatory journalism: trolls who would expectorate in the soup, much to the disdain of the suckers.

Michele Ferrari: Boom Goes the Dynamite!

1994 Fleche Wallonne Classic.  Three Gewiss riders do an impossible breakaway in a classic race and all three make the podium.  Moreno Argentin, first. Giorgia Furlan, second. Evgeni Berzin, third.  But news emerged that Team Gewiss had hired suspected blood doping doctor Michele Ferrari, and the Fleche Wallonne Classic results were directly related to a new blood-boosting and performance-enhancing drug recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO).  Michele Ferrari was referred to by the cycling community as "Doctor Blood" the wizard of EPO physiology, who was also accused of doping other professional riders.  Michele Ferrari also had a nasty reputation: he stated in an interview that recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) was no more dangerous than drinking ten liters of orange juice.

In 2001 David Walsh, with the help of the Carabinieri, linked Lance Armstrong to Michele Ferrari: the result was an investigatory story: Saddled With Suspicion.  In a panic, Lance Armstrong attempted to blunt the impact of the David Walsh story by doing an abortive end run by inviting La Gazzetta Dello Sports writer Pier Bergonzi to an interview.  In the interview with Pier Bergonzi, Lance Armstrong reportedly said, "you have not asked me about Michele Ferrari?"  Surprised, Pier Bergonzi asked, "Should I have?"  Lance Armstrong replied:  "He and I are working together because we're going to make an attack on the one hour record." PP.151-152.  David Walsh sarcastically comments that he knew there would never be any attempt by Lance Armstrong to beat the one hour record, and there never was.  The Pier Bergonzi interview backfired; people were wondering "why a rider who says he is clean and opposed to doping would work with a doctor who has the dirtiest reputation in cycling and is about to go on trial for doping professional riders?" P.166.  The David Walsh story generated international headlines, was the magic man, Lance Armstrong, really riding clean or was he Michele Ferrari's Frankenstein dope-fueled monster?

Lance Armstrong's Iron Shield Begins To Crumble?

Then rumors began to surface from unexpected places about doping going on at U.S. Postal.  Greg LeMond's old mechanic Julien De Vriese, who was also Lance Armstrong's mechanic, hinted that there was a culture of "secrecy" at U.S. Postal that was masking a doping program. P.169.  Then there was the notorious telephone call between Greg LeMond and Lance Armstrong.  The text of the conversation was provided by Greg LeMond.  Note: Lance Armstrong claims that Greg LeMond was intoxicated from alcohol at the time of the conversation and Armstrong insists Greg LeMond was offended because Lance Armstrong had not invited him to attend the Ride of the Roses, and for most of the conversation Greg LeMond berated Lance Armstrong in a drunken hysterical rage.  Alas: will we ever know the truth here?  Nevertheless: Greg LeMond's version deserves some comment.
Armstrong to LeMond: "Well your comeback in eighty-nine was so spectacular.  Mine was a miracle, yours was a miracle, you couldn't have been as strong as you were in eighty-nine without EPO."
 LeMond: "It is not because of EPO that I won the Tour-my hematocrit was never more that forty-five-because I had a VO2 max of ninety-five. Yours was eighty-two.  Tell me one person who said I did EPO?"
 Armstrong: "Everyone knows it."
 LeMond: "Are you threatening me?"
 Armstrong: "If you want to throw stones, I will throw stones."
 LeMond: "So you are threatening me?  Listen, Lance.  I know a lot about physiology; no amount of training can transform an athlete with a VO2 max of eighty-two into one with a VO2 max of nine-five, and you have ridden faster than I did."
 Armstrong: "I could find at least ten people who would say you did EPO.  Ten people would come forward."
 LeMond: "That's impossible.  I know I never did that.  Nobody can say I have.  If I had taken EPO, my hematocrit value would have exceeded forty-five.  It never did.  I could produce all my blood parameters to prove my hematocrit level never rose above forty-five.  And if I have this accusation leveled against me, I will know it came from you." PP.172-173; italics added.

Then Greg LeMond plays his ace in the hole card: "What Michele Ferrari did in the nineties changed riders."

Greg LeMond's logic is perfect.  Lance Armstrong admitted to using EPO!  Lance Armstrong threatened Greg LeMond!  Lance Armstrong had a lower VO2 max so he couldn't have outpaced Greg LeMond!  Greg LeMond refused EPO because his hematocrit level never exceeded forty-five!  EPO was used in the peloton in 1991, not in 1990, but in 1991!  Well now.  Does the fact that Greg LeMond's hematocrit level never exceeded forty-five proof that Greg LeMond never used EPO?  Nonsense!  The UCI used to tip the riders off during Greg LeMond's reign that the vampires were on the way!  A simple saline solution dilutes hematocrit levels.  Haematocrit levels decline under strenuous exercise like riding in the Tour de France.  Then there is this statement Floyd Landis made in a letter to the UCI and USA Cycling on May 6, 2010, that is very pertinent.  Floyd Landis was selected as a rider to support Roberto Heras during the Tour of Spain.  Floyd Landis remarked in his letter:
"EPO, EPREX by brand and it came in pre-measured syringes.  I used it intravenously for several weeks before the next blood draw and had no problems with the tests during the Vuelta.  Again during the Vuelta, we were given Andriol and blood transfusions by the team doctor and had no problems with any testing!" P. 360; italics added.
Micro-dosing EPO intravenously, if done properly, will never raise your hematocrit level above forty-five.  What do think of that Greg LeMond?  Also, according to The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA): [Update: This web site has been removed.  Wonder why?  Nevertheless, this statement was published by WADA and is not a fabrication.]
"While the fight against stimulants and steroids was producing results, the main front in the anti-doping war was rapidly shifting to blood doping. "Blood boosting," removal and subsequent re-infusion of the athlete's blood in order to increase the level of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin, has been practiced since the 1970s. The IOC banned blood doping as a method in 1986."
"Other ways of increasing the level of hemoglobin were being tried, however. One of these was erythropoietin (EPO). EPO was included in the IOC's list of prohibited substances in 1990, however, the fight against EPO was long hampered by the lack of a reliable testing method. An EPO detection test (approved by WADA) was first implemented at the Sydney Olympic Games in 2000."
Thus, EPO was commercially available by prescription in 1989, 1990, and 1991* and who is to say that the entire peloton was not micro-dosing EPO and re-infusing their own blood at the same time?  EPO could not be detected at the time.  Greg LeMond uses the same old trite argument, I was below the threshold therefore, I am innocent.  Lance Armstrong used the exact same argument, I was tested 2000 times, there was never a positive test, therefore, I am innocent.  But Greg LeMond goes further.  Greg LeMond says in a single year, in the 1991 Tour de France, the peloton went from clean to doped on EPO, even though EPO was available in 1989 and 1990.*  Greg LeMond reasons that he finished seventh in the 1991 Tour de France @13 minutes 13 seconds behind Miguel Indurain because of widespread use of EPO within the professional peloton. It was obvious, Greg LeMond had a superior VO2 max, so Miguel Indurain could have never outpaced him without EPO.  This would be considered excellent logic except that during the EPO era, which apparently included the 1991 Tour de France, all of the riders in the top ten were considered to be using EPO, and this would include of all people Greg LeMond!

So here is a perfect example of how twisted logic can skew the data. I have warned everyone about the fallacy of trying to fail an athlete for performance-enhancing drug use on the bases of anecdotal or longitudinal evidence that is based upon probabilities for years.  My objections have fallen on deaf ears.  Furthermore, careers of athletes should not be terminated without concrete proof that a performance-enhancing substance is present in the sample.  But who cares?  Non-analytical positives are all the rage these days.

Then, of course, there is Lance Armstrong's former Motorola teammate Stephen Swart who claimed Lance Armstrong and the Motorola team were using EPO in 1995.  Stephen Swart claimed the team had a portable blood centrifuge and the team routinely measured their hematocrit in the field, and that Lance Armstrong scored consistently above the UCI maximum of 50%.  Stephen Swart also claims he went to a Switzerland pharmacy and purchased EPO, which he used during the 1995 Tour de Suisse.  Stephen Swart also claims his EPO supply ran out during the prologue of the 1995 Tour de France, but Stephen Swart claims EPO did nothing to improve his performance.  David Walsh claims Stephen Swart used EPO during the Motorola period to comply with the Lance Armstrong philosophy, "if you are not doping, then you are not a team player." P.254.

Then there is Emma O' Reilly, former U.S. Postal Service soigneur, and personal masseuse for Lance Armstrong during the 1999 Tour de France.  Emma O' Reilly made a series of startling statements. She claimed she saw Doctor Luis Garcia del Moral backdate a corticosteroid medical prescription for Lance Armstrong for saddle sores she claims never existed.  Emma O' Reilly also stated she disposed of used syringes the team had placed in a crushed Coke can.  Emma O' Reilly also stated she had been employed as a 'drug mule,' claiming she picked up a shipment of testosterone for George Hincapie.  Emma O' Reilly also claims she used some cosmetics to hide needle marks when Lance Armstrong reported for his pre-race physical for the 1999 Tour de France.  And a litany of other egregious outrages. P.253.

Then there is Betsy Andreu and the Indiana University Hospital statement that Lance Armstrong allegedly made to a group of doctors who were inquiring into his medical history.  The doctors asked Lance Armstrong if he had taken any performance-enhancing drugs, and Lance Armstrong, according to Betsy Andreu, stated he had used a number of performance-enhancing drugs.  There is a great deal of witness inconsistency with this account, however.  Stephanie McIlvain, who worked for Oakley, testified under oath at the Sports Contest Associates (SCA) arbitration hearing, she did not hear Lance Armstrong make any admission to using performance-enhancing drugs, although she was in the room at the time. P.314-315.  However, later, in a taped conversation with Greg LeMond, Stephanie McIlvain claimed she heard Lance Armstrong admit to former drug use in the hospital room conversation.  Adding to the confusion, Lance Armstrong's former girlfriend Lisa Shiels, when asked if she heard Lance Armstrong admit to drug use, claims she heard nothing of the sort, although she was present in the room at the time. P.316.  I wonder if Greg LeMond and Betsy Andreu, "the crazed bitch" didn't employ intimidation tactics on Stephanie McIlvain to force her to change her recollection.  But, this episode gets even more bizarre:
"Dr. Craig Nichols, one of the doctors who had supervised Lance Armstrong's case and who was now chief of hematology, oncology at Oregon Health and Science University, said in a sworn affidavit that he had 'no recollection' of any statement by Lance Armstrong while in treatment confessing to the use of performance-enhancing drugs.  He added: 'Lance Armstrong never admitted, suggested or indicated that he has ever taken performance-enhancing drugs.'" P.332.
However, in an ironic twist:
"On 27 October, Indiana University announced that the Lance Armstrong Foundation had funded a 1.5 million endowed chair in oncology.  Craig Nichols affidavit was signed on 8 December." P.332.
 The implication, of course, was that Lance Armstrong bribed the oncology department, payola for silence.  Lance Armstrong declaimed a furious response:
"It was a million and a half dollars, and I understand that's a lot of money.  But to suggest that I funded that chair to get an affidavit or to get some clean medical records or some sanitized records is completely ridiculous." P.332.
Floyd Landis: Letter to the UCI and USA Cycling.  The Final Nail in the Coffin.

The come back of Lance Armstrong to the Tour de France in 2009 infuriated Floyd Landis.  Marooned on the Ouch team in the continental United States, Floyd Landis wanted nothing more than to return to the European UCI Pro Tour team circuit.  Abandoned and unable to secure a contract, Floyd Landis watched the doper and chief Lance Armstrong return in third place on the Tour de France podium; while Floyd Landis was forced to compete in the Tour of Utah.  When Lance Armstrong and Johan Bruyneel formed Team Radio Shack, Floyd Landis swallowed his pride and phoned Johan Bruyneel begging for a position on the team.  Johan Bruyneel sarcastically replied there was no position available because Floyd Landis was "radioactive," and a public relations nightmare.  In response, and with nothing to lose, Floyd Landis penned the immortal letter that would end history's "greatest sporting fraud."  In the letter to the UCI and USA Cycling, Floyd Landis outlined in shocking detail a number of pertinent doping topics, including the rumor Lance Armstrong had tested positive for rEPO during the 2000 Tour de Suisse, and the allegation Lance Armstrong had paid a gratuity to the UCI to cover up the result:
"He [Lance Armstrong] later, while winning the Tour de Suisse, the month before the Tour de France, tested positive for EPO, at which point he [Lance Armstrong] and Mr. [Johan] Bruyneel flew to the UCI headquarters and made a financial agreement with Mr. [Hein] Verbruggen to keep the positive test hidden." P.357.
Later, in Seven Deadly Sins, a comical conversation occurred between Lance Armstrong and attorney Jeff Tillotson during Lance Armstrong's Sports Contest Associates (SCA) deposition.  Jeff Tillotson attempts to link the $25,000 donation given to the UCI by Lance Armstrong to suppress the positive 2000 Tour de Suisse synthetic EPO test: money that was allegedly used to bribe Hein Verbruggen to silence.  Of course, Lance Armstrong attempts to skate around the issue the best he can while looking like a total fool. Lance Armstrong can't remember what the $25,000 donation was for, how the money was spent, or whether the donation was related to any specific event.  At one point, an exasperated Jeff Tillotson asks Lance Armstrong: "Why the UCI?  I mean, why give money to the UCI?"  Always good for a laugh, giving money to the UCI to combat doping.  Of course, the official reason given by the UCI for the donation was the purchase of a highly sophisticated blood diagnostic unit that could aid in the detection of performance-enhancing drugs: specifically synthetic EPO.

But back to Mr. Landis;
"I had learned at this point how to do most of the transfusion technicals and other things on my own, so I hired Allen Lim as my assistant to help with details and logistics.  He [Allen Lim] helped Levi Leipheimer and I prepare the transfusions for Levi and me and made sure they were kept at the proper temperature." P.363; italics added.

Allen Lim followed Floyd Landis around in Spain during his training rides, helping Floyd Landis reach the Michele Ferrari magic plateau of six watts per kilogram, the power output needed to win the Tour de France. Floyd Landis referred to Allen Lim as a walking machine, a human calculator.  Allen Lim spent time calculating the proper blood transfusion temperatures for Floyd Landis and Levi Leipheimer.  Where is Allen Lim today, still designing ice filled time trial jerseys?  Allen Lim is another example of people who should be banned from cycling.  How does our sport maintain a set of ethical principles when a person like Allen Lim is permitted to be employed by cycling teams after his involvement in scheduling doping products for riders?

 Go read Seven Deadly Sins.  You are bound to learn something new if you are a neophyte doping researcher or a seasoned professional sleuth.  Seven Deadly Sins does tie up most loose ends.  I give Seven Deadly Sins my highest rating.

Conclusion:

We all know how the episode ended.  Not to be outdone by Floyd Landis, Tyler Hamilton raced to the airwaves and did an incoherently manic interview on 60 Minutes. The U.S. government was not far behind.  Jeff Novitzky launched a criminal probe trying to link the expenditure of U.S. Postal Service money to drug trafficking.  The subpoena mill started churning, ex-teammates of Lance Armstrong were whisked off the streets, held for affidavits and depositions.  Grand Jury testimony was heard.  Although the criminal probe was dropped, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) quickly launched an investigation which terminated with civil complaints against several ex-members of the U.S. Postal Service team, including Lance Armstrong, Johan Bruyneel, Luis Garcia del Moral, and Pepi Marti.  Michele Ferrari "doctor blood" was also charged with facilitating the use of performance-enhancing drugs on the U.S. Postal Service team. In response, Lance Armstrong filed a legal challenge in U.S. Federal Court against USADA over jurisdictional issues. Lance Armstrong insisted that USADA had no jurisdiction because his cycling license came under the jurisdiction of the UCI, therefore USADA had no standing. U.S. District Court Judge Sam Sparks dismissed this argument as facetious stating that when Lance Armstrong was issued his license by USA Cycling, he agreed to be tested by USADA, therefore he fell under USADA jurisdiction in all doping compliance issues.  In a second amended court challenge, Lance Armstrong contested the validity of the arbitration process as an unfair kangaroo "star chamber" proceeding. Judge Sam Sparks dismissed Lance Armstrong's argument, ruling that the current arbitration structure provided adequate due process protections.  After this ruling, Lance Armstrong, in a surprise move, announced that he would not contest the USADA charges in arbitration.  There exists a stipulation in the USADA bylaws (some might call it a loophole) that states: if an athlete decides to wave the arbitration process then USADA is free to impose an award; including a lifetime ban if the ban is agreed to by the UCI and WADA.  Travis Tygart imposed a lifetime ban on Lance Armstrong and Michele Ferrari both of whom waived arbitration.  Pat McQuaid announced that the UCI would not contest the Reasoned Decision: a compilation of evidence and testimony gathered by USADA as the bases of their complaint.  The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) soon followed suit.  Then, of course, there was the Oprah confession which ended all doubts of everyone for all time and proves that Lance Armstrong was nothing more than a joke.  Thus ended the "greatest fraud in cycling history."  Investigatory journalist David Walsh was vindicated.  David Walsh, who from the start stated that the Lance Armstrong was Griska Otrepyev, or the false Dmitri, the son of Ivan the Terrible who was assassinated by Boris Godunov, or the false Czar, or pretender to the throne, was proven correct.  In a curious aside, Griska Otrepyev was assassinated after one year of rule, his body was cremated, and his ashes were fired out of a cannon.  Lance Armstrong was merely burned in effigy, the only thing missing was the cannon!

David Walsh makes several references to LA Confidential, but since I have not read the book I will not comment here.  But I have read From Lance to Landis!  No comment here either, make of it what you will.

Update

*According to a American Society of Hematology paper, The Story of Erythropoietin, "In 1983, scientists discovered a method for mass producing a synthetic version of the hormone".  According to the Washington Post, "Amgen and Johnson and Johnson earned billions on the trio of anemia drugs Epogen, Procrit, and Aranesp since their introduction in 1989". "June 14, 1989: The FDA approves use of a new anemia drug, erythropoietin alpha, in patients with kidney disease. It will be marketed as Epogen and Procrit".  The 1989 Tour de France ran from July 1 - July 23, 1989. So technically, synthetic EPO could have been used by the professional riders during the 1989 Tour de France.

Thursday, July 3, 2014

2014 Tour de France: Dope Free!

Yeah, I had to emerge from my cave, cause it is time for the Tour de France, all reformed from the chronic days of dope, dope, dope!  Sure enough, the riders will go through the sham physical to measure their fitness levels, three thousand miles of hammering throughout the state of France with variable weather and terrain features are no joke!  It would be great if the physicals also collected urine from the entire peloton and farmed out to those infallible WADA laboratories for examination, prior to the grand depart, then there would not be so many rest day surprises. There always seems to be somebody who tests positive during a rest day test, much to the chagrin of the teams who end up packing their bags for an unceremonious exit.

Not to worry, though.  The UCI has swept the garbage out the door, the days of bribery and cover-ups have gone through a state of metamorphoses.  The old UCI was best compared to rats emerging from a sewer.  But behold, the new and improved UCI is now praised as a shining beacon of truth, straightforwardness, and transparency!  The UCI mantra is zero tolerance and eternal vigilance.  Don't dare to dope!  Vampires are waiting, and if we don't detect you with a urine or blood sample, there is always the UCI Biological Passport waiting in the wings; and as everyone knows, the UCI Biological Passport is superior in all aspects to positive tests.  Trends and tendencies take precedence over solid, indisputable evidence.  If you don't believe me go ask USADA, who claims that in 2009 and 2010 longitudinal data prove  Lance Armstrong used performance-enhancing substances during those years.  Of course, Lance Armstrong claims that he used nothing post-2005, but who are you going to believe, Lance Armstrong or the UCI Biological passport?

So watch out Christopher Froome and Team Sky, we are ready to "pounce" on you if we detect the slightest variation in your physiology; not that we suspect you and your team of doping!  Three years of dominance by the same team in the Tour de France seems impossible without artificial aid of pharmaceutical origin; but maybe I am being cynical, being burned and lied to by my past heroes time and again.  There is nothing worse than watching a breathtaking performance on the bike by a professional rider in a physically demanding race.  You are mesmerized, transfixed with attention, heart pounding, zealously applauding your hero as he drops the group at a fatal moment up some beyond category col; the deciding moment! only to have the whole performance exposed as a charade fourteen years later.  These episodes are devastating to pure cycling fanaticism, and are perhaps not singular, either.  But they certainly don't catch every Tour de France champion who used performance-enhancing drugs, or do they desire to expend the effort to investigate every case, the trail does grow cold after years of inactivity, cold cases do prove hard to solve, but there is plenty of antecedent evidence available if one were inclined to play the sleuth.

After all, doping didn't start in 1999 and end in 2010, give me a break!  Ever done leg breaking intervals up to a steep incline in a large gear in thirty plus degree Celsius heat?  Sweat streams off your face in buckets, you feel like you are going to die.  Try doing that for four straight hours over a hundred hard mountain miles; category three, two, one, HC, cols: how do those professional riders recover from such demanding physical tasks without taking a daily saline solution to re-hydrate?  How do these riders replenish their glucose stores in one day after such demanding physical tasks?  Pasta and meat chunks?  The feed zone?

Mitochondria works best with oxygen, baby!  What's the best way to provide oxygen to the mitochondria?  A blood transfusion with your own stored blood.  You reduce the risk of infection and the vampires can't detect a thing.  By the way, blood transfusions used during the Tour de France didn't start in 1999 and end in 2010!

So get ready to play the sleuth.  We may not have justice for past crimes that will never be punished, but we sure can "pounce" on the crimes that have yet to be committed.

Saturday, May 17, 2014

Every Second Counts: Book Review


Every Second Counts, Lance Armstrong, and Sally Jenkins, Broadway Books, 2003.

Lance-o-phobes might consider Every Second Counts as a masterpiece of dissimulation.  This estimation would be too simplistic, however.  It is true, Lance Armstrong does a masterful job of denial of doping, he spins a mighty yarn.  Nevertheless, the book is not all about dope.  Lance Armstrong did suffer from a virulent form of invasive testicular cancer that metastasized into his lungs and brain.  Mr. Armstrong was subjected to traumatic chemotherapy, surgeries, and radiation treatments.  Against all odds, Mr. Armstrong fought and survived cancer.  I think Mr. Armstrong created the Lance Armstrong Foundation without mercenary motives: a place where cancer survivors could meet, share experiences, and be consoled by other cancer survivors.  The Lance Armstrong Foundation survives in spite of the personal backlash Mr. Armstrong experienced after the Reasoned Decision and the Oprah doping confession.  The foundation Lance Armstrong created still exists, but the foundation has been re-named Livestrong.  Mr. Armstrong resigned as the leader of the team.  Nevertheless, the Livestrong foundation continues to help people who suffer from the most insidious disease of all, cancer.

Cancer awareness and education is a good thing, after all, we all know someone who suffered from cancer.  My mother had breast cancer, she is a survivor.*  A friend of mine, Collin, was diagnosed with stage IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma.  I was his roommate.  He was a gifted college varsity athlete.  Collin needed a bone marrow transplant.  His stem cells were harvested, his immune system was killed, he was given radiation and chemotherapy treatments.  His stem cells were re-infused.  One fine day while at the University of Utah hospital, Collins' lungs began to cleave cells, he spent days expectorating blood.  Collins' condition deteriorated to the point that he was placed on a "death watch."  But Collin had the will to live and the man beat all odds: his lungs healed, and he was released from the hospital, his cancer in remission.  Then began after-effects.  Collin injected EPO to raise his red blood cell count.  There was little progress.  Collin had a damaged spleen that was cannibalizing his red blood cells, so his spleen was surgically removed.  Then shingles appeared.  Then the bone in his hips suffered severe atrophy; he received bilateral artificial hip replacements.  Then he began to experience cognitive problems with language and reasoning.  Then: unexpectedly, his cancer returned.  After the L'Alpe d'Huez stage during the 2001 Tour de France, the Salt Lake Tribune published a photograph of Lance Armstrong flexing his biceps, over the caption "King of the Hills."  I cut out the photograph and glued it to the wall in the garage where I used to work on my bikes.  Collin declared Lance Armstrong to be his favorite athlete.  Mr. Armstrong meant a great deal to both of us in those days.  Collin died one night in a convalescence home, from a ruptured artery.  Thus ended a valiant battle of a man whose life was terminated in such a sadistic fashion, by such a callous foe: cancer.  I have empathy with cancer patients and survivors; I have seen suffering first hand. I commend the intrepid research being done at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, and at other institutions who are committed to finally ending cancer as a disease once and for all.  I hope a cure is discovered soon, that extends to all cancer types.  In the meantime, never give up hope, ever.

Every Second Counts is a snapshot of happier days for Lance Armstrong, he was still married to Kristin Richard, he was focused on raising his son Luke, he was ecstatic about the birth of his twin daughters, Grace Elizabeth, and Isabelle Rose.  Mr. Armstrong was a loving husband and father, for the moment.  Later, Lance Armstrong divorced "Kik."  Kristin Armstrong lived in Austin, Texas with the children while Lance Armstrong lived in Girona, Spain, in his castle flat with his life in girlfriend Sheryl Crow.  A run amok playboy.  Not so family-focused then, of course.  Later there would be other women with whom Mr. Armstrong would sire children.  The later behavior of Lance Armstrong would tend to reinforce the opinion of the Lance-o-phobes.  Lance Armstrong is nothing more than a narcissistic selfish hedonistic psychopath.

A comment on the rough treatment Sally Jenkins received from the press after she attempted to support Lance Armstrong after the USADA allegations surfaced.  You paragons of virtues who live in glass houses should refrain from casting stones, for if you should stumble, the same fate awaits you.  Leave the poor woman alone.

Lance Armstrong Quotes
"It was not hard to feel that I'd been singled out because I was successful and American."
"Anyone who thought I would go through four cycles of chemo just to risk my life by taking EPO was crazy.  It was one thing to seek to maximize performance or explore a pharmacological grey zone.  It was another to court death."
"Luke's name is Armstrong and people know that name, and when he goes to school I don't want them to say, 'oh yeah, your dad's the big fake, the doper.'  That would just kill me."
The first quote by Lance Armstrong typifies his attitude towards his doping.  Indeed, Armstrong used the same logic when he stormed out of a meeting with Travis Tygart: everyone doped, but I am the only one being punished.  The second quote is a masterpiece of misinformation: what former cancer patient would take risks that might prompt a return of cancer?  Most sound-minded people would agree; the side effects of performance-enhancing drug use is not fully understood; drugs might trigger a genetic predisposition or genetic trait and terminate remission: so why take unnecessary risks?  The third quote, apparently, motivated Lance Armstrong to confess his crimes on Oprah.  Luke was being teased about his doper father, and Lance Armstrong wanted to set the record straight.  Ignoring the sincerity of his motives, these statements provide a window into the psychological makeup of Lance Armstrong as a man.

Tour de France 1999

Right from the start doping allegations plagued the miracle man.  Lance Armstrong was detected using a corticosteroid that was on the WADA prohibited list.  There were people who claimed Lance Armstrong, on his original therapeutic use exemption form filed with the UCI before the race, declared he was not using any forbidden prescribed medications by a doctor essential for his health.  Furthermore, under oath, Emma O' Reilly testified the corticosteroid prescription for saddle sores "that never existed" was backdated by Dr. Luis Garcia del Moral.  David Walsh alleges the UCI was fully cognizant of this prescription forgery.  However, Lance Armstrong would contest these versions of the story insisting he had followed proper protocol.
"I used an analgesic cream that contained corticosteroids to treat a case of saddle sores, so the press reported that I tested positive for a banned substance.  It was untrue.  I had received permission from race authorities to use the cream." P.76.
Nevertheless: during the 1999 Tour de France, the UCI decided to gather samples from selected riders that would be preserved until a suitable test could be developed to detect synthetic EPO: a drug that was being abused with particular virulence at the time.  When these samples were tested in 2004 by the French WADA accredited laboratory LNDD, several samples marked with Lance Armstrong's doping control number tested positive for synthetic EPO.  Lance Armstrong's 1999 Tour de France prologue, and 1999 L'Alpe d'Huez stage samples showed nearly perfect synthetic EPO isoforms.  After the mountain stages had stopped, the collected Lance Armstrong samples showed no sign of further synthetic EPO use, but, the samples did mimic physiological parameters that would be expected after an abrupt cessation of synthetic EPO use.  Of course, these tests generated an amazing amount of controversy, and the certainty of the test results remain debatable.  But, in 2004, the UCI, on the recommendation of Emile Vrijman, refused to suspend any of the riders who tested positive, including Lance Armstrong.  Emile Vrijman in a scathing report cited safety concerns with the WADA accredited Chatenay-Malabry laboratory that rendered the results suspect. Emile Vrijman also chided the behavior of WADA president Dick Pound, who openly opined on numerous occasions a philosophy that anyone suspected of using performance-enhancing drugs was guilty of committing crimes, and contesting the accusation in arbitration against infallible WADA was nothing more than a deceitful ruse on the part of the athlete.  Christiane Ayotte remarked that she found the LNDD results "surprising" due to the fact that stored EPO samples would degrade over time, thus the quantitative content of EPO in the samples could not produce the almost perfect isoform values measured at LNDD.  Christiane Ayotte also wondered if the prevailing attitude among the alphabet agencies was drifting toward acceptance of unverified "positive" samples.  The "A" samples of the 1999 Tour de France were not available in 2004 for testing.  Nevertheless, these "positive" results did fuel speculation that the miracle man might have been doping for his entire reign, and these rumors refused to die.

Tour de France 2000

After Lance Armstrong won an Olympic time trial bronze medal in Sydney, Australia, [since rescinded] he returned home to an announcement that the French government had opened a criminal doping probe against him and the U.S. Postal Service Professional Cycling Team.
"During the 2000 Tour, someone surreptitiously videotaped two of our medical staff as they threw away a couple of trash bags.  The tape was sent anonymously to a government prosecutor, as well as to the French 3 television station." P.72.

The medical waste supposedly contained traces of actovegin, a drug that may possibly aid recovery from acute injury.  However, actovegin was not on the prohibited list at the time.  Nevertheless, Sophie-Helene Chateau, the judge of instruction,
"Promptly subpoenaed all of my urine samples from the 2000 Tour as well as those of the rest of the U.S. Postal Service team.  She appointed an assistant prosecutor, Francois Franchi, to conduct an investigation.  We were charged with suspicion of using doping products, inciting the use of doping products, and using toxic substances." P.73.

The tests done on the U.S. Postal riders did not turn up any positives for EPO use.  I think the French launched the investigation for sensationalism.  Although the probe was of a long duration nothing was conclusively proven.  The rumors persisted about the miracle man using performance-enhancing drugs, unabated, however.  Why?

TDF 2000: Hautacam Climb

I remember this stage vividly even today.  Lance Armstrong never looked so smooth on the pedals.  In one kilometer of riding Armstrong was taking one minute out of "en Tete de la course" Javier Palacios Ochoa.  Lance Armstrong dropped Marco Pantani, who initiated an attack, like a hot rock.  The 2000 Tour was essentially over at this point, even though Marco Pantani remarked Lance Armstrong had peaked "too early."

TDF 2000: Mont Ventoux

The cold cruel mistral winds were in full force during this immortal stage.  Marco Pantani attacked and Lance Armstrong responded near the Tommy Simpson memorial.  Armstrong claims he told Marco Pantani to "ride with him," but Pantani claimed Armstrong told him to "get out of the way."  Marco Pantani also was very offended when Lance Armstrong claimed he had gifted Marco Pantani the stage win.  Lance Armstrong later insulted Marco Pantani by referring to him as "Elefantino" rather than the more respectful "Pirata."  This stage still rates as one of the greatest Tour duels of all time.

TDF 2000: Col de Joux-Plane

"Lance Armstrong will not win the 2000 Tour de France."
Marco Pantani
Still smoldering with fury Marco Pantani solo attacked the peloton and built up a lead of over ten minutes.  Lance Armstrong and the U.S. Postal Service team had to respond to this attack up-tempo.  Lance Armstrong was so intent on catching Marco Pantani, Lance Armstrong failed to take a musette bag at the feed zone.  The result of this blunder was a spectacular bonk on the Col de Joux-Plane. Marco Pantani's ploy seemed to be working in masterful fashion.  First, Lance Armstrong was passed by arch-rival Jan Ullrich, then by Richard Virenque, both of whom looked at the stricken Lance Armstrong with amazement.  There is no way of knowing how much time Lance Armstrong would have lost, or even if he would have finished the stage, if not two good Samaritans, Roberto Conti and Guido Trentin, in an act of supreme sportsmanship, had not paced Lance Armstrong to the summit of the climb, and sheltered him from the wind.  Marco Pantani later claimed he suffered "stomach cramps from drinking ice-cold sugar water on a hot summer day," and after being caught by Lance Armstrong, Marco Pantani faded quickly and retired to the back of the peloton.  Marco Pantani withdrew from the Tour the next day, and he would never ride again in a Tour de France, because, he had been granted the notorious title of persona non grata: a title imposed on him because he was suspected of several violations of performance-enhancing drug use during the 2001 Giro d' Italia.  ASO had had enough of Marco Pantani, in the same way, ASO ostracized Richard Virenque; post-Festina.

Tour de France 2001

The doping allegations against Lance Armstrong entered a new phase, but this time the allegations were substantive and long-reaching.  From The Tour Is Won on the Alpe, Jean-Paul Vespini, (David V. Herlihy, Translator), Velo Press, 2008.

"The 2001 Tour was barely underway when the journalist David Walsh of London's Sunday Times published explosive new charges fingering the champion himself, Lance Armstrong, who was seeking his third straight Tour victory.  In a highly detailed article, Walsh presented a number of troubling allegations linking Armstrong to drugs, focusing on the racers' association with the controversial Italian doctor Michele Ferrari, whom the American himself had praised for his integrity.  Walsh asserted that Lance Armstrong had visited the doctor on numerous occasions over the years, and even listed the dates and locations of their encounters.  Walsh also quoted a former Motorola racer who asserted that EPO had been widely used by the team when Lance Armstrong had been a member.  The source also cited a few other troubling affairs, including the case of Lance's former teammate Kevin Livingston, who had experienced strange variations in his red-blood-cell count." PP. 143-144.

TDF 2001: The Team Time Trial

Christian Vande Velde and Roberto Heras collided in the U.S. Postal Service train during the team time trial.  Vande Velde broke his arm and had to withdraw from the Tour.  Since the team time trial clock stops when the fifth rider crosses the line, (thus the picturesque spreading out of the riders at the line), Lance Armstrong could have ordered the team to abandon Vande Velde and Heras.*  Instead, Lance Armstrong ordered the team to wait for Heras and Vande Velde to recover from their accident.  Incredibly, even with the wait, the U.S. Postal Service Team finished the team time trial forth on the course, @ 1 minute 26 seconds behind Credit Agricole, who rode an inspired team time trial in support of maillot jaune Stuart O' Grady.
*Note: the train consists of nine riders if none have abandoned the race previous to the team time trial.  If a rider is separated from the train and falls behind he or she is awarded a separate time.

TDF 2001: Outside of the Time Limit

Then there was an escape by Francois Simon and Russian rider Andrei Kivilev during a rain-soaked stage of the 2001 Tour.  Francois Simon finished the stage with a lead of 35 minutes.  Of course, in the end, this escape did not figure into the final general classification, however, the peloton, including Lance Armstrong and Jan Ullrich, did finish outside of the time limit.  According to race rules, Lance Armstrong and Jan Ullrich could have been disqualified from the race.  In spite of the insistence from some disgruntled fans that everyone outside of the time limit be disqualified, Tour officials found a loophole in the rules: if a certain percentage of the peloton fell outside of the time limit, then the disqualification could be waived if a reasonable cause could be found for the delay.  Torrential rain might be an acceptable excuse, or possibly a blizzard.  But stupidity?  After all, nobody wanted to expend the energy to reel in the breakaway, did they?

TDF 2001: "The Look" L'Alpe d'Huez

Lance Armstrong put on a masterful performance of suffering during this stage.  Feigning fatigue and illness Lance Armstrong fell to the back of the leading group, a place where many riders "go out the back."  Scenting blood Jan Ullrich and his Team Telekom lieutenants drove a hard tempo, trying to drop Lance Armstrong.  But at the base of L'Alpe d'Huez, an amazing transformation occurred.  Lance Armstrong experienced an amazing recovery, the recently exhausted man suddenly showed amazing resilience.  Lance Armstrong launched an attack, looking over his shoulder through his Oakley sunglasses at Jan Ullrich, while Phil Liggett commented, "Well, are you coming or not?  The answer is not!" as Lance Armstrong pulled away.  This brazen audacity by Lance Armstrong became immortalized in the annals of cycling as "The Look"

The reaction to Lance Armstrong at the summit of L'Alpe d'Huez was mixed.  From: The Tour Is Won on the Alpe, Jean-Paul Vespini, (David V. Herlihy, Translator), Velo Press, 2008.

Both applause and disapproving whistles greeted Lance Armstrong at the finish line.  The crowd at L'Alpe d'Huez, as skeptical as it was admiring, was focused on a fundamental question: was Lance Armstrong really the great champion of the new century, or did he simply have access to a yet unknown pharmacopeia?  It was rather unjust to be suspicious of him at that point.  The American, after all, had always claimed to be clean, and no firm evidence had indicated otherwise.  Jan Ullrich finished second 1:59 behind.  He had lost over 8 seconds per kilometer behind Lance Armstrong, "the motorcycle." P.144.

TDF 2001: Pla d'Adet

The course of Pla d'Adet passed the spot where Lance Armstrong's former Motorola teammate Fabio Casartelli died during a Tour descent in 1995.  Jan Ullrich almost duplicated Fabio Casartelli's feat when failing to negotiate a turn, he plunged off a precipice into the trees.  Incredibly, in spite of all indications, Jan Ullrich emerged unscathed.  In a gesture of supreme sportsmanship, Lance Armstrong stopped pedaling and waited for Jan Ullrich to catch up.  On the last climb Pla d'Adet, Lance Armstrong attacked Jan Ullrich who did not respond:
"I crossed the finish line alone and toppled off the bike, spent, the new leader of the Tour de France.  We had done what Johan [Bruyneel] asked, and attacked at every opportunity, and the result was that we had won three of the last four stages, and made up 35 minutes and 24 places in the standings.  In two days alone, we'd made up 22 minutes.  It set a record for the biggest deficit ever overcome." P.118

Remarkable what obsessive training and performance-enhancing drugs can accomplish.  If there was a concern about Lance Armstrong using performance-enhancing drugs during the 2001 Tour de France, the suspicions should have focused straight on the results of these stages.  There was simply too much uniformity of performance, that indicated artificiality.

2004 Tour de France: Lance Armstrong Goes Postal!

During the 2001 Tour de France, the invariable questions from the press and public ensued; all focused on Michele Ferrari, who was under investigation for allegedly supplying riders with doped blood.  A link had been established between Michele Ferrari and Filippo Simeoni; a proven doper.  In the investigation of Michele Ferrari, the name Lance Armstrong surfaced.  Lance Armstrong stated that Michele Ferrari had advised him merely on mundane matters: altitude testing, power meter training, watts per kilogram; legal topics that all top riders discuss to improve performance.  Lance Armstrong also claimed that he was working with Michele Ferrari in preparation for an attempt on the world record one hour ride.  But Michele Ferrari had a bad reputation: he brazenly declared in an interview that EPO was no more dangerous than drinking ten liters of orange juice.  Michele Ferrari was also a star student of Francesco Conconi, a notorious doping doctor who was accused of providing human growth hormones and doped blood to the 1980 Italian Olympic Team.  Francesco Conconi had also designed a medical regimen for Francesco Moser: to prepare him for his world record one hour ride in Mexico City in 1984, a ride that dwarfed the old one hour Mexico City world record ride set by Eddy Merckx in 1972.  Francesco Moser would later admit he had injected "doctored" blood prepared by Francesco Conconi and Michele Ferrari.  During the 2004 Tour de France, a curious incident occurred between Filippo Simeoni and Lance Armstrong that directly related to Michele Ferrari.  After Filippo Simeoni publicly accused Lance Armstrong of using illegal substances provided by Michele Ferrari, Filippo Simeoni attempted to join a breakaway on flat stage 18 near the end of the 2004 Tour.  There was no need to reel Filippo Simeoni in, as he was no threat to the general classification.  But unexpectedly, and contrary to cycling etiquette: (a maillot jaune never leaves the peloton to ride down a breakaway), Lance Armstrong went after Filippo Simeoni with a vengeance.  Lance Armstrong reportedly told the breakaway group, if Filippo Simeoni did not return to the peloton immediately, Lance Armstrong would order his team to attack and reel in the breakaway.  The riders in the breakaway group, seeing the maillot jaune in the breakaway were furious with Filippo Simeoni, because he was jeopardizing their chances for a stage win.  Filippo Simeoni had to submit to the pressure, he capitulated, returning to the back of the peloton where he faced further rider insults.  Later, Filippo Simeoni declared he had been threatened by Lance Armstrong: and he filed a lawsuit demanding compensation.  The case was settled in Filippo Simeoni's favor.  This incident was later cited as evidence of bullying and tactics of intimidation Lance Armstrong used throughout his professional cycling career: tactics which included forcing his hapless teammates to use performance-enhancing drugs against their wills: all to satisfy Lance Armstrong's monomania to be the greatest Tour champion ever.

Spinning a Myth: It's All About the Weight

Lance Armstrong does spend some time discussing his weight: prior to and post-cancer.  This discussion cannot be ignored because during the Motorola period Lance Armstrong rode an average Tour, and most years he withdrew long before Paris.  Since Armstrong maintained an aura of innocence as to his drug use there had to be another explanation for his tremendous improvement on the bike; a magic bullet, if you will.  A University of Texas physiologist Edward F. Coyle performed a series of experiments on Lance Armstrong and concluded that the increase in performance from prior to post-cancer was the result of increased pedaling efficiency, and loss of weight.  Edward F. Coyle's conclusions generated a furious debate among other sports physiologists, however: some called his research bunk, others questioned his methodology, and some even accused him of miscalibration of his instrumentation.  In Every Second Counts, Lance Armstrong does a masterful spin job of misleading dissimulation to support Edward F. Coyle's conclusions.

"Every once in a while, I'd deliver a big ride: when I was 21, I had come out of nowhere to win the Worlds, and then a stage of the Tour de France.  But mostly I cruised for months at a time, performing decently but not exceptionally, just meeting the definition of "professional."  After cancer, I realized I'd been operating at about half of my abilities.  For one thing, I carried 15 to 20 pounds more weight than I should have, some of it in puppy fat and some of it in margaritas and tortilla chips.  After cancer, I was twenty pounds lighter." PP.155-156.

"Under Johan [Bruyneel], I began training seriously, and kept the weight off, and discovered what a huge difference it made in the mountains, where your own body was your biggest adversary.  The lost weight, I discovered, made me 10 to 12 minutes faster over a mountain stage; I figured it saved me about three minutes on every mountain pass I rode.  As a young rider, I would start off at the gun and just go.  I didn't really know how to race: I mashed big gears and thrashed around on the bike.  My position is all wrong. Now with Johan [Bruyneel] and Chris Carmichael, I studied proper aerodynamic positioning and effective cadence." P.156; italics added.

Indeed!  It was obvious.  It was better training, altitude tents, better coaching, better diet, higher drive and motivation, improved technology, power meters, improvements in skin suits, space-age bicycle design, wind tunnels, computer analysis of power outputs.  But dope?  Forget about it!

Conclusion:

As Lance Armstrong told Floyd Landis: "There was no mystery and no miracle drug that helped me win the Tour de France in 1999!"  This statement is disingenuous, of course, but it does reinforce the notion that winning Grand Tours requires hard work, and nobody worked harder than Lance Armstrong.

Lance Armstrong also misleads us when he claims after his former teammates departed U.S. Postal Service they maintained good relations.  Tyler Hamilton lived in Girona, Spain; and when he joined CSC, Tyler Hamilton claims he actively avoided Lance Armstrong like the plague.  There were rumors Lance Armstrong fired Kevin Livingston, who joined Team Telekom (T-Mobile) to bring in the Spanish rider Roberto Heras, and further interactions between Armstrong and Livingston were terse, at best.  In Every Second Counts, even though Lance Armstrong speaks very favorably of Floyd Landis, who had just received a new two-year contract with the U.S. Postal Service Professional Cycling Team, by the end of the contract Floyd Landis was so fed up he would have retired from cycling rather than continue with the U.S. Postal Service Professional Cycling Team.  As Lance Armstrong says in his book, "some people regarded him as a tyrant," and from accounts of his conduct, there appears, today, very few who would disagree with this statement.

Update 2020

* A lady friend of mine, her name is Gail, has a particularly difficult time dealing with cancer.  All four of Gail's sisters are dead.  Three of Gail's sister's died of cancer at a very young age.  Gail's fourth sister died young of unknown "natural causes".  When Gail's sister Janice lost all of her hair as a side-effect of chemotherapy, Gail and her family members shaved their hair in support of Janice, and vowed to remain bald until Janice recovered.  Gail and her family shaved their heads to raise cancer awareness among the community, and Gail and her friends launched a cancer awareness Internet campaign stylized, #Janice's Army, or #Janice's Army Strong, on Facebook.  Janice died in 2017 from cancer.  In May 2019, Gail's last remaining living sister, Debi, died of cancer.  Debi's obituary states, "No funeral is planned.  In lieu of flowers, donations may be made toward fighting cancer."  An appropriately blunt message.  When I got confirmation that Debi had died, I wrote this message to Gail.  "I am heartbroken for you.  My mom died in September 2019, from bone marrow cancer.  My mom had a virulently pernicious breast cancer that metastasized throughout her whole body.  My mom suffered for years with chronic pain, she dealt with chemotherapy treatments, baldness, radiation treatments, and expensive hospitalizations.  So, I understand your pain".  Gail greatly suffers emotionally from the loss of her sisters.  Gail said her sisters were; "my best friends".  My mother is no longer a survivor, she is a statistic.  Gail's sisters who died of cancer, Janice, Valerie, and Debi are no longer survivors, they are statistics.  Cancer leaves behind a wake of family tears, shed by mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters.  "In lieu of flowers, donations may be made toward fighting cancer".

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Doping Indifference is Contagious

First, there is outrage expressed by a furious public declaiming that the perfidious practice of cheating scoundrels who have forever contaminated our sacred sport of cycling must cease!  The media blitz pontificates a need for reforms, the public expresses their displeasure, the fanatics wander around dazed and confused wondering how such a thing could happen.  Then there are the regulatory agencies, asleep at the wheel, who are invested with the sacred duty of monitoring cycling, burdened with the responsibility of deterring and punishing people who are tempted to use illicit drugs to gain an unfair advantage.  The International Cycling Union (UCI) pontificates their position with hypocritical passion; while allegedly accepting bribes under the table to protect favored riders.  The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) maintains a policy of "fair play," while at the same time they administer laboratory tests on samples of athletes that have no scientific reliability or validity.  WADA also employs an arbitrary and capricious set of standards; physiological ranges that are subject to modification at the whim of the prosecution.  These variable physiological ranges indicate "use" of performance-enhancing drugs, ( these physiological ranges once considered a "normal" range, now magically constitute "proofs" ), these "proofs" are generally rubber-stamped by arbitration panels, who agree to change the "rules" mid-stream, thereby effectively destroying the tactics of the athletes' defense team.  There is a sacrosanct philosophy that scientific evidence generated by WADA is considered "infallible," so challenges to the laboratory papacy are considered warrant-less heretical attacks, by wealthy guilty athletes, who have generated so much income from cheating, that to question WADA generated scientific "proofs" amounts to nothing more than divergent obstructionism.  According to WADA, wealthy athletes can afford to hire a staff of high priced lawyers who specialize in confounding the "proof" merely as a divergent tactic, a base amusement, merely because wealthy athletes suffer from ennui.  Of course, there is ample evidence of accused athletes who had no wealth at all; athletes who are poorly represented, or athletes who cannot even read or understand the language of the accusing document.  These "unfair" facts are ignored, the accused in these cases are minor players, collateral damage to be sacrificed to the altar of WADA infallibility.  Journeymen riders have professional careers that have little impact on cycling; so if these riders are treated inhumanely, nobody cares.  These "second tier" athletes who are treated in such a cavalier fashion fall below the threshold of public scrutiny, so their abuse does not resonate with the public.  Awareness of these cases falls below the threshold, and these victims of injustice are shunted into other professions and disappear without a trace after enduring insufferable humiliation. After all, the mantra is: if WADA has evidence, you are guilty, so there is no need to defend yourself.  Accept the dictated reward, serve your time, then if you are deemed worthy, return to the peloton, if you can secure a contract.

There is a huge difference between being a second rate journeyman rouleur and a winner of the Tour de France, however.  The fate of a rouleur may be regarded with indifference, while the fate of a Tour de France winner encourages hot debate!  This debate peels layers off the sacrosanct philosophy of WADA scientific evidence, like peeling a rotten onion.  The heresy is not generated by wealthy athletes suffering from ennui, but rather from people who have been awarded doctoral degrees, and who are considered experts in their respective fields of study.  Public opinion is better directed by a professor who has conducted scientific experiments in the area being investigated than a professional lawyer who has an invested interest in clearing his client.  A scientific expert may be regarded as impartial as to motivation, therefore, credible as a witness.  WADA has an invested interest in winning cases to ensure more of a market in providing laboratory testing to professional sports leagues who govern professional athletes; therefore the credibility of WADA motive in guaranteeing a fair level playing field for the athlete is suspect.  It is also important to note that there exists in many sports an unnatural incestuous relationship between WADA and the agency governing the sport, (for example, the UCI) and this invites probable illegal collusion between the two.  In a time of crises, when questionable scientific practice is revealed by professional investigation into the arrogant laissez-faire scientific practice being conducted, such as documented violations among WADA accredited laboratories, violations that result in the WADA accredited laboratory falling outside international norms, blatant lack of quality control, ignorance of protocol, there is a propensity to conclude from this evidence that this practice is directly responsible for producing spurious results!  Contesting the origin of these spurious results in a legal format and referring to the testimony of expert scientific witnesses who present convincing arguments, does not make the evidence presented against the athlete any less spurious.  But the public process does expose the laissez-faire arrogance of the alphabet soup groups who maintain the fallacy of infallibility, and public exposure generates an awareness that the process has been so abusive and so devoid of public accountability that there is a certainty that athletes in the past have been unfairly accused and punished.

This vendetta against athletes, this unfairness in the process, this arrogance, generates hysteria among the concerned public who are appalled that such behavior among the regulatory agencies can be tolerated.  But the hysteria soon evolves into apathy due to overexposure; there have been so many people who have claimed innocence who are guilty.  People become jaded, the agencies, in spite of their callous disregard of the rights of due process prove to be right in their assessments, not because they are infallible, but because the accused have no honesty.  Constant exposure to dishonesty in virulent forms generates extinction; people are constantly bombarded by the stimulus, but it does not penetrate into perception above the threshold.  Floyd Landis, Alberto Contador, Ryan Braun, are perfect examples of the bad stimulus.  Liars all, these men have raised the threshold for possible abuse of athletes' rights to an unacceptable level, based upon the premise that anyone accused of wrongdoing; must be a liar.  As a consequence, public concern has declined to an unacceptable level of acceptance of the status quo.  Worse, the public has accepted the concept that anyone accused of cheating is guilty, so tactics employed by the accusers are "fair," and that abuse of athletes' rights do not merit any consequences to the anti-doping agencies responsible for the abuse of process.

Ryan Braun lied about using performance-enhancing drugs.  He accused the courier of tampering with his samples.  Ryan Braun was exonerated not because he was guiltless, but because the people who wrote the chain-of-custody rules; were outside of the law!  Therefore, Shyman Das had no choice but to invalidate the suspension.  The press called this invalidation of the suspension, a technicality, not an abuse of process, or simply incompetence, or indifference, to the right of the athlete.  Nevertheless, Ryan Braun did the effort to maintain "fairness" in the anti-doping process irreparable harm by the initiation of an unnecessary appeal that was based upon lies.  Athletes who base appeals upon lies, opaque the situation, making it more difficult for falsely accused athletes to present a credible case.

Sickening.  Worse.  The Milwaukee fans cheered Ryan Braun at his first at-bat with a standing ovation.  Sickening.  Doping in Sport?  Who cares anymore.  What was once considered an outrage is now regarded with accolades and cheers.  The public wants winners, like vulture's want corpses.

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Bryan Byrge and John Coons: A Sad Saga

John Coons 

Bryan Byrge 

Bryan Byrge, 39 and John Coons, 35 were on their weekly cycling jaunt to work when they were killed instantly in a head-on collision with a pickup truck while turning left at the corner of Redwood Road and Twenty-First North in Lehi, Utah.  The accident happened at six o' clock in the morning before sunrise.  The dark may have been a contributing factor, but contrary to the statement made by the Lehi police: there were no contributing weather-related issues that could have "impeded visibility."  Bryan Byrge and John Coons both were family men who left behind wives and children; men who were very respected by the community.  The stupid senseless deaths of these men prompted the cycling community to organize a group memorial twenty-mile ride, and over a hundred cyclists participated.

The driver of the pickup truck, whose identity is unknown, was also hospitalized in the accident.  The investigation as reported in the press, could not identify who was at fault, the pickup truck driver, the cyclists, or the fact that there was no fault by either party; but from the tone of the reporting the most likely conclusion will be the patented "I did not see them" excuse, and the most likely outcome of the investigation will be no formal charges or criminal prosecution of the pickup truck driver.

Remember, cyclists, when you are lying dead on the road that you are in no condition to testify about your behavior, or whether you were following the rules of the road.  You are presumed to be at fault simply because you are on the road.  This idiotic notion has emerged because there is a minority of cyclists who ride with a blatant disregard of the rules, a fact that is editorialized in newspapers by disgruntled people with an anti-cyclist bias.  The truth is far different than the perception portrayed in the press; professional cyclists are strict adherents to the rules, they have to cycle carefully to survive the onslaught of automobile drivers who are either incompetent or aggressively belligerent.  The fools who act out on bicycles are not professional cyclists, but they sure do seem to garner all of the attention!  And there is an additional problem associated with foolish cyclists; when automobile drivers encounter a person who follows the rules they seem to be confused as to what to do; like deer staring into the headlights.  This adds to the safety concerns cyclists experience every day; the confused automobile driver.  For example, at intersections, I tend to let automobiles go first because it has been my experience that when you put foot to the pedal, automobile drivers put foot to the accelerator.  Then there is that awkward breaking moment, followed, of course, by a noxious adrenaline rush, and a propensity to want to explode into a verbal tirade of frustration.  But the experience in these matters is the best teacher and may end up saving your life.  Patience saves lives.  Wave the fools through!  Bryan Byrge and John Coons were responsible people who from their very nature were road rule followers to an excessive degree of caution, but this caution did not save them from a horrible end.

What about the pickup driver?  What personality traits did this person possess?  Was this person in a hurry or distracted?  After the funeral of Bryan Byrge and John Coons, will this person simply disappear completely without penalty after killing two people?

Remember Josie Johnson?

Photo credit: KSL news.

Josie Johnson, a young woman who was killed while climbing Big Cottonwood Canyon on her bicycle, by a woman who wasn't paying attention!  Josie Johnson was riding on the shoulder out of the traffic lane when she was rear-ended by a woman driving a sports utility vehicle.  The last time I rode up to Big Cottonwood Canyon, a bouquet of flowers was left resting at Josie's accident site, adorned with tears, placed by a sensitive soul who is tired of all this senseless slaughter of cyclists! Every year there is the Josie Johnson Memorial Ride, ridden to lament this senseless decimation of young cyclists who are murdered on the roads every year!

Josie Johnson Memorial Ride original bib. Bibs were worn to honor fallen riders who died on the road.  Photo: velovortmax.


I have a challenge for all of you who editorialize in the media about the horrid cyclists and their disrespect for the rules of the road.  Come ride with me for a month, if you have the courage!  You will see the road from the perspective of a cyclist!  But I am warning you that you will have to learn defensive cycling skills very quickly or you will die!  You will be another statistic lying dead in the road!  You will not have an opportunity to defend yourself!  You may develop an attitude adjustment when you realize that that cell phone wielding zombie who is bearing down on you at thirty miles an hour is about to end your paltry existence!  You either get out of the way or die, it is as simple as that!  These enjoyable experiences happen several times every day!  And just wait until you are hit by a car!  Only a suicidal maniac would continue to ride after being hit by an automobile, but we pros do so every day with pleasure!  Then, after a month of this fun, you can go back to your editorializing in the newspaper, scolding people who don't know how to drive!

I didn't even mention the people who drive automobiles who intentionally try to kill you or cause you harm.  But these paragons of social virtue exist in the world too.  People who make obscene gestures, people who shout, "get off the road!"  People who throw objects at you.  People who drive up behind you and honk their horns.  People who spit on you.  People who deliberately try to run you off the road.  How about mentioning these facts in your editorials, eh?

Sure people need to be educated about automobile/cycling safety.  But education is a two-way street. Cyclists can't control the behavior of automobile drivers and vice versa.  Nevertheless: it is a given axiom that people should not be allowed to kill cyclists with impunity, and they need to be punished for their crimes.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Cycling Doping History: What's Your Version?

Whenever I ride at night on a darkened street,
And storms are heard at dusk all-day-
O friend defenseless, ill and homeless,
Before me suddenly your shadow gleams.
Nikolay Nekrasov

Actually, the poem title is Whenever I Drive at Night (1847), not ride; but according to a book I read, the poem was an adaption of Alexander Pushkin: Wherever I may Wander (1833), which is probably misleading!  Being a poor liberal arts student with a smattering of biology, who am I to not suffer from confusion, especially when I was not there to inquire of the poet himself as to his supposed plagiarism, and had to guess instead.  Or incapable, through lack of specialized knowledge; I must rely upon and accept expert opinions of other people, who are supposed to be all-knowing, and subject to vetting and fact checks before publishing a load of rot.  You think I trust Greg LeMond for one instant after the load of crap he has disseminated on the cycling community?  Well, I don't.  Do you think my case against Greg LeMond is insufficient to prove that there were opportunities for Greg LeMond and the peloton of his era to dope with both blood and drugs?  The fact that the 1984 USA Olympic team used blood transfusions to medal in the Olympic games, where America as a country had not won an Olympic medal since 1912 when Carl Schutte won a bronze medal in the individual time trial, and the American team, Carl Shutte, Alvin Loftus, Albert Krushel, and Walter Martin won bronze medals in the team time trial; is pointless to discuss, because there was no official Olympic games prohibition against using blood transfusions in 1984 or 1912!  Nevertheless, according to the La Vie Claire apologists, blood doping was a top-secret venture unknown to the professional peloton, (except for the East Germans): La Vie Claire, Greg LeMond, and Bernard Hinault were completely ignorant of these methods, and even if they were aware, they would never stoop so low.  But, perhaps you are joking about the impeccable honesty and integrity of Tour de France champions of the past, which is sheer nonsense, regardless of your psychological bias or selective references.  The Lance Armstrong haters spit vitriol for years with no scientific proof, yet they were convinced of their correctness, and woe to anyone who would have the audacity to disagree with them!  Of course, you can't disagree with the Greg LeMond groupies or their rock-solid scientific grounds, the man never failed a dope test, even if methods of doping that existed at the time had no known tests or the fact there was no prohibition as to the use of some of these methods; even if they had known performance-enhancing qualities.  But, we are devolving into illogical semantics: if it is not prohibited, then can it be cheating? Can a person rationalize the use of substances known to improve performance because they are not yet illegal, as an acceptable practice to win prizes and accolades?  Then there are bleating sheep, who, when suspecting others of using the same methods now prohibited by statute, encourage them to confess their crimes, to come clean, to display what? a guilty consciousness?  Or do these tears of remorse, as to the damage done to cycling by miscreant present-day dopers merely display your own repressed guilty cognitive subconsciousness, and are you, Mr. LeMond, trying to assuage your old crimes by casting stones at others, when you yourself did not suffer any penalty?  Do your pleas for clean riding and your accusations express the fact that you cheated your fellow cyclists like a worthless scoundrel; or the fact that your sordid conduct was rewarded with laurels?

So who developed the test to detect synthetic EPO?  Was it Jacques de Ceaurriz?  Or was it LNDD without Jacques de Ceaurriz?  Was it Don Calin at UCLA?  Or was it Christiane Ayotte in Montreal?  What was the true role Francesco Conconi played in the development of a test to detect recombinant erythropoietin, and what role did the International Olympic Committee play in the development of this test?  Perhaps claims made in certain cycling reference books should be subjected to better editing before publishing, because certain "facts" presented as "truth" may in fact be nothing more than grossly misleading rubbish.  If you suspect books or articles of spouting disinformation, then why not invest some of your time and your effort to write a book review pointing out all of the errors yourself.  Or better yet, why don't you offer your services as an editor, since your knowledge is all-encompassing.  Don't forget to provide references to support your assertions.  And if you have something to say, say it publicly, you don't need to hide behind a veil of secrecy.  Because, as it stands, your corrections are selective, incomplete, and based on an agenda.  Not quite an objective way of proving things, is it?

I would rather be reading Alexi Pisemsky, One Thousand Souls, than worry about who was doping with what, or when, in the 1980s; or concern myself with who is cheating now.  Because, even contemporary truth is subjected to fraud, fiction, cover-up, ignored, or distorted by evil people who have mercenary motives to mislead the public.  This misleading agenda leads directly to disagreements and factual errors.  Thus your version may not exactly coincide with my version, but that does not mean that I will forego my version to accommodate a popular cycling opinion invented by Greg LeMond; using the resources available to me.  Of course, I expect you to do the same, never claiming a monopoly as to what constitutes historical truth or to what constitutes historical fallacy.  That way we can agree to co-exist.

Finally, I don't do promotions or advertising on my blog spot!